Dennis Hackethal’s Blog
My blog about philosophy, coding, and anything else that interests me.
Tweets
An archive of my tweets and retweets through . They may be formatted slightly differently than on Twitter. API access has since gotten prohibitively expensive – I don't know whether or when I'll be able to update this archive.
But in case I will, you can subscribe via RSS – without a Twitter account. Rationale
@tjaulow @ChipkinLogan @astupple @popper1902 @RichardDawkins @ella_hoeppner
There are many “theories of consciousness” along those lines but I’m not particularly impressed with them. Self-referentiality has a woo-woo status somehow. May have to do with recursion being intimidating. Don’t see how that explains anything.
@tjaulow @ChipkinLogan @astupple @popper1902 @RichardDawkins @ella_hoeppner
Yes, I’ve had similar thoughts.
Also interesting how we forget most dreams quickly after waking up. Must be short-lived replicators. Adapted to the dream state, overwhelmed in the waking state.
@tjaulow @ChipkinLogan @astupple @popper1902 @RichardDawkins @ella_hoeppner
Not sure I understand—mind elaborating on humor? You’re saying there’s an explanation of humor that says the same thing I wrote about consciousness?
I like it but too easy to confuse with memes when heard spoken.
@micahtredding @RichardDawkins
Ah. Not sure why you threw linguistics in there but yes, generally speaking, just thinking of an idea may help spread it through the mind.
Judging by my notifications it took you three min to read a fifteen min essay?
@micahtredding @RichardDawkins
What do you mean by "simulation" here?
@micahtredding @RichardDawkins
Ok but it sounds like those terms mean something else (not to mention that that entire section is mostly false even within memetics).
The neo-Darwinian theory of the mind isn't about memes at all. It'd just be good to have a term to disambiguate the ideas it describes from memes
.@RichardDawkins vs @BretWeinstein: a commentary.
@micahtredding @RichardDawkins
Another difference is that memetic evolution is a property of groups of people, whereas mental evolution of ideas is a property of individuals, and would still happen in complete isolation.
@micahtredding @RichardDawkins
One difference is that the "inner" replication does not depend on outward displays/behavior which memes depend on. E.g. the meme of waving won't replicate unless people wave to each other. But ideas in a mind can replicate even if you don't enact them.
@micahtredding @RichardDawkins
Not all ideas that spread within a mind spread between minds (but in the inverse they do). Maybe that's what you mean by reach, idk.
Ideas spread within the mind in the sense that they self-replicate.
For context and the role of these ideas in a mind: medium.com/conjecture-mag….
.@RichardDawkins calls ideas that spread between people "memes."
Anyone have any ideas for what to call ideas that spread within a single person's mind? Would be good to have a term to effectively disambiguate them from memes since both are ideas in the general sense.
Out: "largely peaceful protests"
In: "Expecting protests to be peaceful is racist." twitter.com/ConceptualJame…
A reading of my article "The Neo-Darwinian Theory of the Mind":
Another gem from the Medium home page.
At least it seems Medium recommends these articles to me only because I've read similar ones before, so there's some hope not everyone's home page looks this nuts.
Their "Momentum" blog I'd guess is on everyone's home page, though. https://t.co/rsPgWYejil
is doing similar nonsense on the "My Network" page. At the very top (above the "people you may know from ..." section) they now have a "Black voices to follow and amplify" section.
🤮 https://t.co/uHHEcvS6am
My @Medium homepage today.
The meme of addressing "white people" as if they were this homogenous group is spreading well, it seems. At the bottom you can see that Medium is supporting this stuff.
Starting to wonder if I should do a self-hosted blog instead of one on Medium. https://t.co/jtRRTiQV5w
@falibilista @ChipkinLogan @astupple @popper1902 @RichardDawkins @ella_hoeppner
Ok let me clarify. I do think people have free will. Having free will = being the author and enactor of one’s choices. I’d be very interested to know if this clashes with the neo-Darwinian theory of the mind somehow because that would be a problem I’d need to solve.
@falibilista @ChipkinLogan @astupple @popper1902 @RichardDawkins @ella_hoeppner
What do you mean by “the reverse transpires”? That the article makes it sound like I don’t think free will exists?
Cancel socialists like this one. twitter.com/RepPressley/st…
I don't think so, but not all of those resisting forced vaccinations are anti-vaxxers. I don't think you were necessarily suggesting that, but I'm saying it for clarity.
@HeuristicAndy
I wrote a comment on your blog but can't submit it. "Comments on this blog are restricted to team members."
My article "The Neo-Darwinian Theory of the Mind" has been published with Conjecture Magazine (ed. @ChipkinLogan and @astupple). Featuring mentions of @popper1902, @RichardDawkins, and @ella_hoeppner.
“It’s okay for politicians to have dictatorial powers because it’s for your own good. You don’t know what’s best for you. I do. You are a liability to yourselves, and need to be saved from yourselves. Know that I punish you only because I love you.” twitter.com/NYGovCuomo/sta…
RT @popper1902:
"Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again."
It’s impossible to discern a truth or assign likelihoods to theories because there is no criterion of truth or closeness to truth.
All we can do is correct errors. We tentatively adopt theories until we find errors with them.
See Popper’s “Conjectures and Refutations.”
Hmm... how about half an hour of programming. And you?
@HeuristicAndy
We can only hope?! I was painting this as a nightmare scenario.
Some truth in that. Better: an open mind knows it’s fallible and seeks the truth by correcting errors.
There is no likelihood to truth. Truth is true. Explanations are either true or false.
Prediction: people will be forced to get the Corona vaccine, punishable by law. Those resisting will be branded as “grandma killers.” No mention of coercion, only outcomes.
Either CA or NY will be first state to implement this.
While the former is possible and the latter isn’t, the former refers to a process that happens after a conjecture has been created. Once created, we may deduce claims from a conjecture. But there is no process of inference that creates conjectures. That requires evolution.
Grammarly offers "inference" as a synonym for "conjecture." 😱
Rediscovered this classic and hilarious satiric piece: youtube.com/watch?v=dOOQ1Z…
.@nytimes you left a breakpoint somewhere in your JS on your website nytimes.com.
@HeuristicAndy @krlwlzn @ChipkinLogan @olliewaters
I sympathize btw that portraying it as a "career change" trivializes WW's issues. Notwithstanding, WW would not have had to point guns had the government not pointed theirs first, and he could have made his decisions safely, openly, legally.
@HeuristicAndy @krlwlzn @ChipkinLogan @olliewaters
As you know, CRists don't want a utopia. Nor is healthcare in Denmark free. Somebody pays for it at government gunpoint.
WW is (correctly) condemned for violent behavior, but the government somehow isn't. Neither of them should point the gun.
@SlaytonBenjamin @ChipkinLogan @olliewaters
This article says he abandoned her because he felt inferior. huffpost.com/entry/vince-gi…
@HeuristicAndy @ChipkinLogan @olliewaters
Not sure I follow. Are you saying teachers in Denmark are not as poor as Walter White?
Just had a great conversation with @ChipkinLogan and @olliewaters. Before Oliver joined, I remarked to Logan how Breaking Bad is a tragedy about government criminalizing drug use. In a voluntarist society, Walter White could have changed careers peacefully.
Last chance to pre-order my ebook/audio track "A Conversation with William Paley" at 50% off before it goes live tomorrow!
I am confident you will learn more about the mind from this 1hr conversation than from any machine-learning or AI course. :)
Calling it “reverse” is itself misleading. Judging someone by the color of their skin is universally bad in every direction.
A brief mention that creativity = ability to solve problems, then mostly induction and mistaking inborn knowledge for intelligence. No mention of Popper.
I enjoy Kurzgesagt's videos but this one is rather schlechtgesagt. As if Popper had never lived :(
Yes any complex ability that wasn't predicted and is way off the mark for any traditional program behavior would be a good indication.
Resisting to being meddled with is another good indicator (but all good replicators will do this by definition, so doesn't mean its AGI)
Because the leaked knowledge can be (need not be) dogmatic and result in preclusion of knowledge creation, thereby forcing the program down a certain path, at which point the program can't be creative anymore.
Oh, I wasn't coming from an "ableism" perspective and didn't mean it as a snarky remark. I appreciate your work, sir.
Yup that. Also recall BoI chapter 7 that the programmer is in no position to judge whether the program created knowledge or if its just iterating on the programmer's knowledge.
More leaked knowledge = more rigid program. It may not create any knowledge (worse: look like it does)
Oof this one could use a better color contrast.
Nice shot! Great visibility of Saturn and Jupiter with the naked eye these past couple of weeks, too.
If that's at all possible, it would be a good way to avoid leaking knowledge into the program. I have a hunch it's the early decisions in these types of programs that make or break genuine evolution of knowledge.
Ok. I wonder if there's a way the arrangement of particles could itself become code that influences further replication (like in RNA-World Hypothesis). If so, that code should automatically be subject to variation and selection without any additional programming effort.
As you can see in the video, the replication process is quite imperfect.
Good—what happens if you just leave this running for a long time (speed it up and let it sit for a few hours)? Does it create more targeted replicators by itself?
Thinking out loud: don't you already have mutations in the sense that different clusters emerge already?
Does this link work for you? amazon.in/Window-Intelli…
"A Conversation with William Paley"—Pre-order now while it's still 50% off!
I created a Gumroad account, where I'll share things I create in the realm of philosophy, AGI, and software engineering, and anything else I find interesting.
Follow me!
"Governor Gavin Newsom orders all California counties to shut down indoor restaurants, bars and movie theaters"
HOW does he have this dictatorial power?
@wildAnnieMol @johnnycanuckguy @billburr @theMMPodcast
Yes and about how brave actresses are.
@Juyan_Azhang
You didn’t. On the contrary, I probably sound dumb to 99% of people when I say that to study intelligence we should ignore the brain and ignore sense data, as I did in our conversation.
Your conclusion—that we need places where it’s okay to sound dumb—is true.
RT @TCSphilosophy:
"A person's a person, no matter how small."
— Dr. Seuss https://t.co/iAh29ir4q4
This new edition contains more thorough in-text references, fixed typos, and a brief comment on Constructor Theory, among other smaller changes.
An updated version of A Window on Intelligence with some significant errors and omissions corrected is now available.
Kindle users who have the first edition should receive an email from Amazon with the option to download the new one.
@alliero71811366 @ConceptualJames
The web archive would have preserved them anyway (had anyone stored them).
@alliero71811366 @ConceptualJames
I meant a link to the web archive (web.archive.org), which would have shown an archived version of her post (if it was public at the time).
Just because different websites report this doesn't mean she ever really posted it.
Revolution only leads to more violence. Piecemeal error correction is better.
Pass it on. twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/s…
I’m guessing 3 is a close second.
It’s funny because people get a bit freaked out when you ask them to think of a number between 1 and 10 and then you confidently ask them “was it 7?”
Your example of usually winning at Rock Paper Scissors reminded me of the following:
When asked to think of a number between 1 and 10, people don’t do this randomly either. They usually pick 7, because they don’t want to be too close to the halfway point.
It’s always funny when girls do their best to look cute and something goes wrong.
I have not listened to the full interview.
One of the interviewees is Dr (!) Charlotte Riley. From her website (southampton.ac.uk/history/about/…): "I am a feminist historian [...]"
Not a feminist and a historian. No, a feminist historian.
The tweet was deleted. Somebody had the good sense to archive it in time: web.archive.org/web/2020070611…
You can't play the video on there, but the full interview is available here: bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0…
Was about to ask if you planned on open-sourcing it, good stuff!
This looks fake, even if it was reported here and there.
A web archive link to the post would be helpful.
@renovationgb @_Islamicat
Is ginger convert, not Islamicat himself.
Islamicat is usually put fat ginger converts out in sun as punishment ☀️
(Ab)using creativity to enforce the status quo. See BoI chapter 15&16.
These women are slaves of the static memeplex of wokeness. Change my mind. twitter.com/BBCSounds/stat…
RT @SwipeWright:
"A culture that rejects free expression as a value is a culture without a reliable mechanism for error-correction. We can…
@TheOtherMarcus @tjaulow @AW43755181 @ella_hoeppner
The mind implements ideas as functions, which are computationally universal (see Lambda Calculus). Functions can represent explanatory knowledge, rules of thumb, behavioristic ideas... etc. Not all ideas in a mind are explanatory.
You is kidding right? How could you not is do this?
@TheOtherMarcus @tjaulow @AW43755181 @ella_hoeppner
That one can derive predictions from explanations is one thing, but the purpose of the mind—to create those explanations—is another. It's a different focus.
Many schools of thought place too much emphasis on prediction and ~none on explanation, so the distinction is important.
@TheOtherMarcus @tjaulow @AW43755181 @ella_hoeppner
Ah—daydreams (and "proper" dreams) are likewise produced by ideas. Such ideas may temporarily produce faux sense data, some more realistic-looking than others, which are then interpreted by other ideas and produce the sensation of the dream.