Dennis Hackethal’s Blog

My blog about philosophy, coding, and anything else that interests me.

Tweets

An archive of my tweets and retweets through . They may be formatted slightly differently than on Twitter. API access has since gotten prohibitively expensive – I don't know whether or when I'll be able to update this archive.

But in case I will, you can subscribe via RSS – without a Twitter account. Rationale

@VariantenGra @GermanAtPompey

Hatte ich einfach noch nie gehört. Aber es scheint ja regional bedingt zu ein, also ergibt es durchaus Sinn.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@VariantenGra @GermanAtPompey

Parkieren klingt aber komisch.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@ClimateWarrior7

How does that saying go: the harder the challenge the greater the triumph?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @TheAtlasSociety:
Yeah, We Didn't Think So... #SocialismSucks #ShrinkGovernment #GrowLiberty #AynRand https://t.co/dNsrF1fD3Z

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@TheAtlasSociety

Brilliant.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

Tomorrow we may find that DD's hard-to-vary approach is mistaken. And then we can reevaluate ideas we previously discarded. And look for a better principle. And so on.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

Neither that principle nor the theory has any privileged status. It's just a way to criticize and discard theories, not to justify them.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

Also, take DD's guiding principle in science: the search for good explanations. If a theory is a bad explanation, i.e., easy to vary, we reject it. If it is a good explanation, we tentatively keep it.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

Right, I don't privilege any ideas. And it smells good to me :)

Btw, if it wasn't clear, I wasn't referencing BoI because I consider that an authoritative source or anything (that would ironically have been justificationist), but because the topic is well explained in there.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

There's no meta-principle saying "when an idea and another idea that happens to be a principle conflict, always favor the principle."

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

Maybe you want to make an exception to a principle. Maybe lying is okay sometimes. The very fact that you're willing to make exceptions shows that the principle isn't "privileged," as you called it. It's just a guide to help correct errors and to avoid acting on whim.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

Say you have a principle that says that murder is wrong. Or that you won't respond to threats. Or that lying is wrong. Etc.

You can then evaluate other ideas accordingly. Sometimes you may find that an idea conflicts with one of your principles.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

It's not in conflict with the "framework" because principles are likewise conjectures and never set in stone and there are always conflicts between ideas. That some of those conflicts happen to involve principles in incidental.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

Also, I recommend posting consecutive comments as children and grandchildren etc, not as siblings. That way, they're all on top of each other and easier to read as a result because they can be viewed at the same time in a single thread.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

One can be principled fallibilist, a principled justificationist, an unprincipled fallibilist, or an unprincipled justificationist. These things are orthogonal.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

No I don't assess the reliability of my knowledge according to a criterion.

I see if some idea conflicts with the principle. That can lead to either giving up the idea or sometimes even the principle. It helps correct errors. I'm not interested at all in justifying my ideas.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

Regarding how it would work: as I said, people would ask for your consent before taking your property.

Regarding where it has worked: it has never been tried. But that doesn’t mean one shouldn’t try something new or that theft isn’t morally wrong.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

To be clear, I don’t want people to have the ability to veto something they’ve already agreed to do. I want them to be asked for agreement in the first placement, whenever and before somebody wants to take their property.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@TheAtlasSociety

Haven’t you heard? Everything is racist now. Wanting to keep them closed is surely racist, too.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @RonPaul:
The Questionable PCR Tests

Watch the whole show here: youtu.be/a6tLCjQD8mg https://t.co/oJfLTZBgZg

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@GavinNewsom @fema @SteveBradford @HildaSolis @kdeleon

Do you ever post photos that you aren’t in?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

*the entry on fallibilism

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

No.

And does the entry on justificationism not sound like the opposite of fallibilism?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

And yes there’s a glossary at the end of every chapter.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

So you did not review the glossary?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@nachoiacovino

People learn in school to lie to themselves about their interests. Some become good at things they dislike doing, which is considered a badge of honor.

blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/the-true…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

It's not just a "move." And no, not supported—whether they conflict so you can correct errors.

Look up the entries on justificationism and fallibilism in BoI chapter 1 glossary and tell me they aren't opposites.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@nachoiacovino

You don't need to push through. Having to push through is a sign it's not for you. Find something else you enjoy doing.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

You're just judging ideas compared to the principle, not justifying. You can remain aware of your fallibility and be principled. One instance of that is being a principled fallibilist.

Another name for being principled is to take ideas seriously. blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/taking-i…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DorfGinger

Being principled sounds justificationist or not being does?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

When somebody tells you not to follow principles in a matter, that’s very bad advice because they’re telling you to act on whim. Also, that advice is itself a principle, so it cancels itself out.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@javascriptual

Damn, nice!

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@TextSkizzen

Wie sieht's mit dem Wort "Nachfolger" aus? Klingt nach dieser Logik ebenfalls doppelt gemoppelt, ist aber doch ein feststehender Begriff...

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @ClimateWarrior7:
This "delicious" desert is made entirely from the rectal effluent of a small goat.

In the future, to save the planet,…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @RonPaul:
Ron Paul response to reports President Biden may restrict interstate travel

campaignforliberty.org/ron-paul-respo…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@pmddomingos @paulg

We can certainly speculate, but even the evolution of existing technology is impossible to predict in principle. People think of genuinely new things to do with existing technologies. One cannot predict something that has never been thought of without thinking of it first.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@IKEAUSA

Your system to order parts has been down for weeks. There is no website to check availability. People need to call, select options and hold for minutes every time they want to check.

What are you doing to make this better?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@pmddomingos @paulg

Quoting David Deutsch from his The Beginning of Infinity: “People in 1900 did not consider the internet or nuclear power unlikely: they did not conceive of them at all.”

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@pmddomingos @paulg

That explains the existence of microprocessors retrospectively, but nobody could have predicted them before their invention. That would have taken knowledge nobody had yet.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

Can we go from the descriptive to the prescriptive? From the status quo to how things should be? Again, we're in agreement about how things are right now.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

You don’t get a personal veto on taxation.

Correct. Again, I agree that that is currently the case.

with a personal veto [...] anytime your “property” is involved

I had just given an example where one shouldn't get a veto, even in a libertarian society.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

We will see re lockdowns. Hopefully not. But the precedent has been set. twitter.com/TheAtlasSociet…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

The reason that is an exception is that defensive force is okay in response to aggressive force.

Do you have any refutations of that, instead of just trying to disparage me? Your attacks have gotten subtler, but not necessarily less mean.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

I think you mean “affects” not “effects.”

I don’t think it means liberty means that. Eg if you use your knife (your property) to attempt to harm someone that knife may be removed from you and you don’t get a veto.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @PoorlyAgedStuff:
https://t.co/Gjm1IDBuEJ

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@brbascript

Saul’s lines are the best lines.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @TextSkizzen:
#Praxistipp: „nachfolgend“ ist übrigens doppelt gemoppelt. Formulierungen wie „folgende Mitteilung“ reichen vollkommen aus…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

I don't disagree with what's currently the case. I had already said that I agree that one doesn't currently get a veto. And I'm also saying that one should get a veto.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

Yeah, since all three examples presuppose the existence of "public" property, it's no wonder one doesn't get a veto.

What you're describing is what is currently the case. I was describing what should be the case, based on moral principles of freedom and property.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

You should make your comments children of each other instead of siblings. Would be much easier to read.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@NickHudsonCT

Fixed that: "Parliament should insist that no legal restriction stays in place unless there is a good moral explanation not only that it is people's obligation to ensure availability of health services, but also that its effectiveness is worth sacrificing freedom over."

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @SwipeWright:
A member of the NZ Parliament, human rights lawyer, and self-proclaimed feminist apologizing for saying "women's rights ar…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@TextSkizzen

Kann es auch "hofmeisterische" heißen? Also mit i?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@nalryns @TheHarryPainter @billhabicht @GavinNewsom

As you can see, that question has been asked (and answered) before.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@brbascript

Is that Saul to Jesse?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @ClimateWarrior7:
All gatherings are against the law.

Do not try to make your own pub.

Do not meet up with friends.

Meeting up is…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

I should be entitled to be consulted on and get a veto on every decision that involves my property, yes. And so should everyone else for their property.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

It doesn't indicate that. Somebody can understand how it works and still bemoan the fact that they don't get a say.

Btw, I didn't bemoan that I don't get a say in how the money is spent. I bemoaned the fact that the money is forcefully taken in the first place.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

Also, why are you being so condescending and mean? Can I convince you to turn this into a more matter-of-factly, calm conversation?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@misterbrg @GavinNewsom

U don’t get a veto

That's what I'm saying. Consent implies an opportunity to say "no."

And, while you could move to another city or state, moving to another country is different because you need travel documents. Over which the government has a monopoly.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@HowardSteen4

Please tell me that’s not a Bundesverdienstkreuz.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@GermanAtPompey

"Beamtenlaufbahn" is especially bleak.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@Twitter

Add an integrity attribute to the script tag in embedded tweets so that other sites can't get xss'ed when your script gets hacked?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@lowell_mister @GavinNewsom

I didn't say it does or doesn't exist. I said it's possible.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@lowell_mister @GavinNewsom

Civilization is possible without taxes.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

Congratulations to everyone involved.

Before launch, I signed up to have my name etched onto a microchip on the rover alongside thousands of others, in writing thinner than a human hair. For now, that's as close as it gets to going to Mars in person. :)

twitter.com/i/events/13602…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DKedmey

[...] even ideas that are similar across soups can, in principle, arise.

Correction: they do all the time in separate minds, of course, through faithful meme replication.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DKedmey

When it comes to people and ideas, there are close to eight billion soups on earth right now that all arose separately :)

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DKedmey

And technically, different soups can arise independently (and must have if there's RNA-based life elsewhere in the universe), and even ideas that are similar across soups can, in principle, arise.

It'd be a bit like finding tiger genes in another galaxy. Not impossible...

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DKedmey

Possibly—but according to a colleague at a previous job, one of them would have overtaken by now, with the others most likely being extinct, or at least the entire thing being a single big soup by now.

Either way, once you have a single soup, similar ideas can arise indpndtly.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@billhabicht @GavinNewsom

Check out @PanData19's website for statistics on the futility of lockdown measures.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@billhabicht @GavinNewsom

That's a choice they should be able to make, and do make all the time when it comes to driving, sex and STDs, smoking, drinking, etc.

And it isn't even clear that hundreds of thousands would die. Death rate seems close to regular flu. But it wouldn't change my argument if so.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@billhabicht @GavinNewsom

Letting people manage their own health is a solution, because everyone who prefers to self-isolate is already free to do so, no force needed. And everyone else should be able to go about their business normally, knowing full well they may pay with their health.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@billhabicht @GavinNewsom

Harming people by taking their livelihoods away "for their own benefit" is not an option because one cannot trade one evil for another and make any (moral) progress. That people don't know what's best for them has been used as an excuse to do things to them since time immemorial.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@billhabicht @GavinNewsom

Borrowing from Hans-Hermann Hoppe, right now the government is causing the fire (shutting down businesses) and pretending to be the firefighter rushing to extinguish it (handing out checks with stolen money). It's all very twisted and evil and dishonest.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

It was a great pleasure giving this talk. The recording is now available online, linked below. twitter.com/OxfordPopper/s…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@TonyGMendoza @AgentCo09259883 @billhabicht @GavinNewsom

Isn't it possible for some people to understand what it is and to have identified problems with it at the same time?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@Mr_Wills_Stats @billhabicht @GavinNewsom

I don't think you know what reductionism is.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@billhabicht @GavinNewsom

It's okay.

One idea is that government should immediately stop forcing business closures so that people can continue to make a living.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@orsoscrabble @billhabicht @GavinNewsom

$17 for $1? That sounds like a good deal. How does it work?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

An example of immunization against criticism (Hans Albert): "You questioning the theory is evidence that the theory is true and that you are ignorant."

A woke mind is a trapped mind. twitter.com/mariyaivasilev…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DKedmey

Conceivably

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@DKedmey

I don't know that different sense inputs end up at different parts of the mind. Different parts of the brain, definitely. Mind—not sure.

That said, it's definitely possible, albeit unlikely, for similar ideas to arise independently in the soup, for all sorts of reasons.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@engmac18 @al284159 @DragonNexus @gaybunnypup @GavinNewsom

Your money is your property. It is taken from you by force. If you resist, you end up in jail or worse get shot. How is that not stealing?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@al284159 @engmac18 @DragonNexus @gaybunnypup @GavinNewsom

Bien dicho. Aparte de unas excepciones, los socialistas nunca quieren trasladarse a un país socialista. En cambio, desean hacer su país socialista.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@NJGeneralsUSFL @Yascha_Mounk @SwipeWright

That “power disparity” isn’t that clear cut. Employers often depend on employees. And when employees are in high demand, they can and often do have the upper hand in contractual negotiations.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

In fairness to them, it seems that the article is putting the word “force” in their mouths. No quote of those affected uses the word “force.”

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

They’re choosing to pray and then bemoaning the absence of a service (prayer rooms), labeling that force. If any force is involved it is that of oppressive religious memes not giving them the option not to pray.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

Common equivocation of the word “force.” It’s not like anyone is physically placing them in bus stops and yelling “pray!” with no way out for them. twitter.com/BBCNews/status…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

RT @diemauerthewall:
Berlin Wall in 1962.
#Berlin #GDR #ColdWar
#berlinermauer #berlinwall #diemauerthewall

Photo: Franz Hubmann https:…

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@engmac18 @gaybunnypup @GavinNewsom

Why should I debate someone this condescending, who ignores my questions but expects me to answer his?

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@bare_kigger @GavinNewsom

I have, but I'd much prefer to have the option to use infrastructure funded with voluntary money.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@engmac18 @gaybunnypup @GavinNewsom

I doubt you understand my position because you keep arguing against things I never argued for. I also never said privatization was the state's fault.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@beer_ninja6 @DustinSkenando @GavinNewsom

The collective does not have needs, only individuals do

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@darkedgex @GavinNewsom

Police won't help defend against aggressive state force because the state has the monopoly on police force.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

@engmac18 @gaybunnypup @GavinNewsom

You didn't answer my question.

@dchackethal · · Show · Open on Twitter

Search tweets

/
/mi
Accepts a case-insensitive POSIX regular expression. Most URLs won’t match. Tweets may contain raw markdown characters, which are not displayed.
Clear filters