Dennis Hackethal’s Blog
My blog about philosophy, coding, and anything else that interests me.
Tweets
An archive of my tweets and retweets through . They may be formatted slightly differently than on Twitter. API access has since gotten prohibitively expensive – I don't know whether or when I'll be able to update this archive.
But in case I will, you can subscribe via RSS – without a Twitter account. Rationale
I'm guessing this is the profound evil that can be committed by good intentions.
@HeatherEHeying @HHMusicOfficial
How about letting him sleep?
A teacher’s union explicitly supports the (symbolic?) murder of the most successful man in history. twitter.com/CTULocal1/stat…
We see Howard getting back at Jimmy, Jimmy and Kim in his new office with the pillars, and Kim worrying about going to jail... season 6 foreshadowings? 😳
Comrade Newsom is like a totalitarian parent. “The better your grades, the more screen time you’ll get.”
Not to mention that businesses are just going to LOVE opening, closing, re-opening etc in rapid succession as the data change. twitter.com/GavinNewsom/st…
@MagnetThatcher @RichardDawkins
As for the last point, I guess the "amounts" of evolution compare roughly as follows:
"intra-ideas" >>>> memes >> genes
@MagnetThatcher @RichardDawkins
Here are some reasons:
- Vast majority of "intra-ideas" never become memes
- I don't think memes are essential to explaining how the mind works (only its biol. evolution)
- Vast majority of the evolution occurring on Earth is that of "intra-ideas," not memes or genes
@RJsnda @ks445599 @ella_hoeppner
I think spreading better epistemology and Popperian ideas is a good start.
@MagnetThatcher @RichardDawkins
It's a good idea, but I think I'd prefer not to use the term "meme" so there is no risk of confusion.
@tjaulow @RichardDawkins
They are not necessarily unconscious. Don't know what you mean by "commuting."
@ks445599 @RJsnda @ella_hoeppner
Yes, I'm saying that it's not obvious. Maybe it's true—maybe it's not—but either way, it's not obvious (because nothing is).
@RJsnda @ks445599 @ella_hoeppner
Ok. Popper wrote about the dangers of labeling something as "obvious." The truth is hard to come by. And once found—though we can never know we have found it—it can easily be lost again.
@RJsnda @ks445599 @ella_hoeppner
Are you familiar with Popper's work on manifest truth?
Has anyone explained how and why head trauma leads to depression, or have they merely pointed out correlations of proxies they labeled "depression"?
My overall intention is to draw attention to the fact that reductionism of the sort "it's ALL hardware/neurons/chemicals" are dehumanizing because they disregard creativity, and presumably they miss the vast majority of the causes of mental issues: software/bad ideas.
For some cases, that may be so. I don't deny that hardware issues can sometimes lead to mental issues—though I think even in those cases, the mental issues are ideas meant to interpret one's hardware problems.
@ella_hoeppner @moreisdifferent @bnielson01
Not to mention that induction is impossible.
It can help if that increased processing speed is accompanied by an increased error-correction rate for faster knowledge creation. Also, the mind may conjecture ideas with bad performance characteristics.
But yes, making a month's worth of progress in a day is possible!
But depression and anxiety are themselves states of mind.
Maybe if a hardware issue impedes one's problem-solving ability.
It's not trendy not to force "the right" ideas onto kids.
My conclusion for now: look to Musk for engineering insight, look elsewhere for philosophical insight (particularly Deutsch and Popper). This presentation is a good example of how much money and time Musk could save and how much more money he could make with better philosophy :)
Unfortunately, I doubt Musk is available to discuss any of this. I think the best thing that could happen is if by some chance he reads David Deutsch's "The Beginning of Infinity" and takes the ideas in the book seriously.
Software is an emergent phenomenon that can be explained independently of the hardware. Perhaps it's not surprising that a neuroscience company has a hardware bias, but these are important errors that could be fixed by—you guessed it—philosophy.
The quote is also evidence that Musk is definitely a reductionist, because he throws together concepts like AI (which is software) and the limbic system and cortices (which are hardware), which doesn't make sense.
In the wannabe-AGI-slaveholder department Musk is heavily influenced by Bostrom.
Do you see how much pessimistic prophecy suddenly found its way into a meeting of otherwise optimistic celebration of engineering progress? Existential threats? Society-wide planning? Etc.
"And so I think it's going to be important from an existential-threat standpoint to achieve a good AI symbiosis, and that's what I think might be the most important thing that a device like this achieves."
"...and having that symbiosis be good such that the future of the world is controlled by the combined will of the people of Earth. That's obviously going to be the future that we want, presumably, if it's the sum of our collective will..."
"On a species-level basis I think it's going to be important for us to figure out how we coexist with advanced artificial intelligence [and] achieving some kind of AI symbiosis where you have an AI extension of yourself, like a tertiary layer above the limbic system and cortex.."
Okay the live stream is over so I can now rewind to the corresponding passage and quote him properly:
Musk's approaches to AGI "safety" and social "planning" are oddly totalitarian and pessimistic sounding. Knowledge of engineering won't help with that. He needs more knowledge of philosophy. Disconcerting given how much influence he has in terms of being able to spread ideas.
Third, summing the will of everyone with the link into the "will of society" doesn't work without introducing all kinds of inconsistencies and paradoxes. See Balinski's and Young's theorem as explained in BoI chapter 13. There can be no coherent "will of the people."
AGI "control problems" are, as I have explained elsewhere, cynical, slaveholder-like, mind-control games. Don't control AGIs, let them be. They're people like you and me.
First, an AI "extension" of oneself (if it is AGI) doesn't make sense. An AGI is a person. You can't be more of a person through some extension. You either have a second person sharing your brain for resources, or you don't. And you either are a person, or you're not.
There may be mistakes in this summary because he said it quickly and I couldn't write it all down in time. BUT if accurate, there are lots of problems with what he said.
Musk just claimed that the biggest thing the link could achieve is (paraphrasing) "symbiosis" with an AI extension of oneself in a tertiary layer of the limbic system and "controlled" AI, and summing together the will of every person into an emergent "will of society."
Yes, I've heard about that "low-level," hardware-based approach. I think it's deficient (let alone dehumanizing).
Maybe then neuronal patterns somehow help you refute your conjectured explanations. But the conjecture has to happen first.
In other words: you can't just "read off" the explanation for consciousness from neuronal patterns. You have to conjecture bold explanations.
Popper decades ahead once again. Paraphrasing from a conversation with Konrad Lorenz (fallibly, from memory): If neuronal patterns were shown to correspond directly to qualia, all you could claim is a tight parallelism, but that says nothing about the mental states themselves.
Employee claims that with the link they could now observe neuronal patterns that associate with mental phenomena (qualia?)
Judging by these statements it seems to me they are reductionist (maybe without explicitly realizing), which will put a pretty hard limit on how much they can understand about the mind.
Musk claims link can shed light on consciousness. Employee expands and claims the "hard problem will vanish very quickly."
Prophecy.
I'm not saying they shouldn't test on animals. I'm saying animal welfare is not an issue.
Employees now signaling how well they take care of the animals. 🙄 "We don't force things on them as much as possible."
The "as much as possible" doing a lot of work there. For, how could the pigs possibly consent to surgery?
Musk says link could serve to create backups of memories and let you upload and download them.
As I've hinted at, in addition to hiring a neuroscientist, I think they would benefit from hiring a Popperian neurophilosopher (i.e. epistemologist) if they really want to tackle big problems like qualia.
Musk just said that eventually they want to get to being able to type using your thoughts. For now they want to help quadriplegic people.
Calling the pigs happy reminds me of the stuff in BoI chapter 12 about mistaking a proxy for the underlying phenomenon.
A brain implant can't solve your problems — that requires creativity. Unless they run an AGI on that implant, which would mean you'd have another person physically inside your head. Don't think that's what they're going for.
See David Deutsch's conjecture that unhappiness is a result of being chronically baulked in one's attempts to solve problems.
Musk claims interfacing with hypothalamus could cure depression, anxiety. I find that highly doubtful. These phenomena are best explained on the level of ideas.
Happiness and other qualia are philosophical problems and properties (or perhaps pieces) of software, not hardware. Do they make that distinction? Are they reductionist? Have they thought about these questions?
Have Musk and the team given thought to the mind-body problem? Do they want to work on the mind in addition to the brain? How can they make predictions about the link's effect on human happiness without an investigation into what happiness is? Etc.
Musk says main purpose of the presentation is to recruit the best people. No prior experience on brains required. The wants to hire in the following domains. What's missing most notably from this list? PHILOSOPHY. https://t.co/XohBOpOww3
Link would connect to phone through an app. Range roughly 15 to 30 feet.
Musk claims link can predict movements of pig on treadmill fairly accurately.
Link in pig that has link is making beeping sounds for incoming neural signals.
At most you could say (for now) that the pig's hardware is functioning properly after link removal.
First pig does not have the link. Second pig used to but doesn't anymore. He claims that second pig is "healthy and happy."
Big epistemological mistake: making a prophecy about human happiness without explaining happiness or similarities and differences between pigs and humans.
I'm glad they tested on animals before testing on humans, which is both safe and ethical.
Musk is presenting demo with live pigs, some of which have the implant.
Musk claims brain does not bleed during procedure as wires are inserted.
Device installed in hole in skull and replaces that portion of the skull.
Device implantable in outpatient procedure in < 1hr without general anesthesia.
If I just understood him correctly, the device he's presenting could play music in your head.
Musk claims Neuralink can fix below problems. From what I can tell so far, Neuralink creates hardware solutions. Therefore, I find it doubtful that it could help with depression and anxiety. Memory seems to me a hybrid software/hardware problem. The rest are conceivable. https://t.co/QHHvqUfEY3
Broadly speaking, Neuralink wants to solve brain and spine problems.
I'll be live-tweeting my thoughts and Popperian comments on the Neuralink keynote happening now: youtube.com/watch?v=DVvmgj…
👇
One does have to wonder how much more and faster progress Neuralink could be making with better epistemology.
That's a great pic, because you can see both phenomena at once!
And yes, this all makes sense now — appreciate the explanations.
How do you make sure short-term decisions like these do not lead to inconsistencies with the BB story line? It must be hard to think everything through every episode.
Yes. (Though, to be clear, in humans, inborn algorithms other than creativity play a very small role in good explanations of human behavior and mental states. It’s mostly about the ideas they create during their lifetime.)
Therefore, we tentatively conclude that animal consciousness is not real.
Also, recall David’s criterion of reality: something is real if it plays a role in our best explanations of something. All animal behavior is perfectly explicable through inborn algorithms. Consciousness does not play a role in those explanations.
There is an explanation linking creativity and consciousness. And an explanation of the genetic mutation that gave rise to both, but is missing in animals.
We don’t have a good theory of consciousness, but we have good, non-refuted theories according to which animals aren’t conscious. Important to distinguish there.
You don’t need to know how to play the piano to detect a flaw in a pianist’s performance.
Yet your husband’s view that the Nazis were aggressors in part because of their genes is surprisingly close to this mistaken view, is it not? I am referring to this public discussion: youtu.be/hYzU-DoEV6k
The plot thickens. If true, highly relevant and eye-opening as to how the communist party in China has been covertly pressuring Western politicians into executing lockdown measures. twitter.com/MichaelPSenger…
David Deutsch offers a compelling, hopeful and inspiring vision for society in his book “The Beginning of Infinity.”
Forget @jack’s disastrous donation of $10m to aggressor @DrIbram. Peanuts, it would seem: BBC now allocating £100m to finance self-censorship and, presumably, active discrimination against those who fit “the wrong script,” meaning white colleagues and collaborators. twitter.com/BBC/status/127…
RT @ChipkinLogan:
My story about Constructor Theory has been published with Gizmodo - gizmodo.com/a-meta-theory-…
@RosePastore @gizmodo @DrBri…
@infexm1 @ExmuslimsOrg
Interesting thought. To me it seemed to indicate she knew exactly what he was getting at but didn't want to admit it.
I didn’t say that was the purpose. That’s the way he wants to achieve his purpose. And surely you would agree that it’s ironic if his goal really is to reduce racism?
A better way to reduce racism is not to put so much emphasis on race and not to stir up hatred like Kendi does
@ckshowalter @giantcat9 @_Islamicat
Jabril is has left for Somalia
By discriminating against white people for being white? Do you see the irony in that?
And today they're writing articles arguing that telegrams are racist.
Does this quote sound to you like he wants to help heal the recovering wounds of the past, or tear them open and put salt in them for political gain?