Dennis Hackethal’s Blog
My blog about philosophy, coding, and anything else that interests me.
Tweets
An archive of my tweets and retweets through . They may be formatted slightly differently than on Twitter. API access has since gotten prohibitively expensive – I don't know whether or when I'll be able to update this archive.
But in case I will, you can subscribe via RSS – without a Twitter account. Rationale
Can we make it $10k per month for everyone indefinitely?
The upside is that they couldn’t do better marketing against environmentalism. twitter.com/disclosetv/sta…
RT @jk_rowling:
I read my most recent royalty cheques and find the pain goes away pretty quickly. pic.twitter.com/s4gl9rlqxl
RT @dchackethal:
@michaelmalice
Maybe “We the People” is where it started to go south. Maybe it should always have been ‘I the Individual’.
Maybe “We the People” is where it started to go south. Maybe it should always have been ‘I the Individual’.
RT @ThePlanetaryGuy:
See those rings?
They’re not artefacts of image processing.
They’re real.
And #JWST just snapped them.
🤏🧵 https://…
Schluckauf ist ein sehr gutes Wort dafür.
Somebody once posted on LinkedIn: “Do you care about diversity?” I responded, “no”. Then I got a warning from LinkedIn that my response violated their community standards or something.
RT @pickover:
Physics, mathematics, nature.
Raindrops are not tear-shaped, as many people think. bit.ly/1p7RPuV https://t.co/2iD…
How cool. It’s like peeking into a parallel universe where Jobs is still alive. twitter.com/maccaw/status/…
RT @nomadcapitalist:
“Germany also announced it will cover December gas bills for homes and businesses under a new plan to cap energy price…
RT @re_alCapone:
Die «Sachverständigen und Sachverständigedeginnen"…
Wieder mal #Gendergaga am Limit beim #ÖRR.
cc: @VDS_weltweit, @OER…
RT @mazemoore:
They scrub the videos but I find them.
This is what they thought of Joe Biden before 2016. pic.twitter.com/3OGUS5Owmm
RT @ClimateWarrior7:
People come up to me all the time and apologise for voting for Brexit. Some of them cry. Many of them carry pictures o…
Some people may not want to go like that. They’re looking for a safe, gentle way to die. Disallowing that is, in effect, forcing them to live.
Suicide (the attempt) is indeed illegal in many countries: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_l…
And even where suicide is legal, it is awful, undignified, messy, and, IIRC, unsuccessful in the vast majority of cases, ie the person continues to live but sustains major, crippling damage.
I’d certainly want the state to stay out of it, let alone euthanize people itself. Those are some of the darkest chapters in history.
What I’m saying is that two consenting individuals, one who wishes to die and one who wishes to help the other die, should both be free to do so.
Wealth tax is evil: blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/wealth-t… twitter.com/nomadcapitalis…
Wealth tax is evil: blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/wealth-t…
Maybe she wouldn’t have wanted to die, had she known that. Or maybe she did know and decided it would take too long or too much effort
Should optimists be able to force pessimists to continue living? Why shouldn’t anyone be able to end their own life anytime for whatever reason?
Why ridiculous? She requested to be killed, after all.
‚Sorgfältig abgesteckter Denkrahmen‘ ist ein guter Begriff. Den merke ich mir
My guess there is no such law, but that it can be extraordinarily difficult in situations such as the one you describe. However, think of children who find happiness in the most difficult of situations, seemingly effortlessly.
I suppose the question boils down to: are there scenarios in which the laws of physics dictate that, to solve a problem, you must use coercion (against yourself or others)?
However, enumerability is important. The difference between the first and second order of infinity, as I understand it (from memory), is that the natural numbers are enumerable whereas the real numbers are not.
I don’t know if that applies to more than three dimensions, but I suspect it does.
Not a mathematician, but I believe today we’d say that length, area, and volume are all on the same order of infinity because there’s a one-to-one correspondence between the points on a line, the points in an area, and the points in a space.
I was wondering the same. Abstracting away enough so that, in Rails terms, any model data (eg posts in addition to comments) that is displayed has such cached HTML pages, automatically set up listeners, etc.
Would be a neat idea for a gem, if one doesn’t exist yet.
RT @TCSparents:
“I shall feel that I have got to be back at a certain time and it would hang like a dark shadow over my pleasure.”
- Winst…
RT @JonErlichman:
Apple’s first computer: pic.twitter.com/1MkyaOPZhC
RT @codinghorror:
Please, please don’t use SMS for authentication. Ever. Use authenticator apps (good) or 2FA hardware keys (best). https:/…
Correction: I’m told the show is not historically accurate. twitter.com/dchackethal/st…
It also says “I don’t think his depravity is worthy of curiosity.” It’s def not to be celebrated, but if we’re interested in criminal rehabilitation, say, it seems worthy of curiosity.
In any case, I should have been more careful to recommend it, esp. as a historical piece.
This article (slate.com/culture/2022/1…) claims they made up things about his childhood, too. That’s lame.
I noticed that there was another apartment on the other side of Dahmer’s, and I wondered why we never learned who lived there. I’m guessing that’s the other real-life person you speak of.
RT @hubertus_knabe:
#onthisday feiert #Putin seinen 70. Geburtstag. Als #KGB-Offizier in #Dresden gratulierte ihm jedes Jahr die #Stasi mit…
They aren’t offended, I don’t have to worry about never getting my book back. Win/win
Another way is to say you have a general policy against doing something, and that it is has nothing to do with them personally.
Eg when someone asks to borrow a book of mine, I tell them I have a policy of not doing that, so it’s nothing personal.
They’re just decolonizing the place.
Kidding aside, now that politicians are personally affected, maybe they’ll realize that all this immigration wasn’t a good idea, and act accordingly. twitter.com/Klaus_Arminius…
Each time I said “no thanks” again until he realized why I didn’t want it and he offered for me to tear off a portion instead, which I then did.
It was difficult but I stayed strong 😅
One can practice with lower-stake situations and gradually increase stakes.
I was recently invited to a dinner and the host passed me, with his hand, a crepe he had made, which I found unsanitary. I said “no thanks” and he insisted three or four times.
Ein Bekannter (Jurist) hat mir mal gesagt, es gebe im Verwaltungsrecht drei Grundprinzipien:
1, „Das haben wir schon immer so gemacht.“
2. „Da könnt‘ ja jeder kommen.“
3. „Wo kämen wir denn da hin?“
Diese drei Ausreden scheinen das Anti-Freiheit-Gemüt generell widerzuspiegeln.
“All I had to do was offer you a drink. It’s hard to believe that fear of offending can be stronger than the fear of pain, but you know what? It is. And they always come willingly.” :(
Thanks. Starting at 0:54, perp to victim:
“Why don’t people trust their instincts? They sense something is wrong, someone is walking too close behind them… You knew something was wrong, but you came back into the house. Did I force you, did I drag you in? No.”
To that last point, IIRC there’s a scene in Fincher’s The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo where the perp (spoiler alert, sorta) remarks how his victims would accept his invitation to come into his home for fear of offending him, even when they expected the worst.
The Dahmer series on Netflix is really good. I learned about a piece of American history and how he got away with his murders for so long.
Social conventions are powerful. Ppl would rather drink questionable drinks than offend the host.
More evidence that the movement-imitation algorithms of cats are too indiscriminate.
The cat does not, in fact, think it’s a horse, nor does it think any thoughts whatsoever. twitter.com/B__S/status/…
RT @MrAndyNgo:
Photos of schoolgirls removing their hijabs & flipping off #Iran’s supreme leader have been posted on social media. #MahsaAm…
RT @dougboneparth:
“Come back to the office, you’ll be more productive here.” pic.twitter.com/2x7q14IxVB
RT @nixcraft:
Linux meme based upon @FieldExplores comic pic.twitter.com/ZzDjfZ2agz
RT @nomadcapitalist:
“Almost 40% of Aussies aged 18-29 are looking to move overseas within the year”, country could lose 600k young taxpaye…
RT @AlexEpstein:
The Biden Administration is calling an OPEC production cut a “hostile act.”
But if it hadn’t been been for the hundred+ “…
RT @disclosetv:
NOW - China starts enforcing its zero-COVID policy with machine guns at Xishuangbanna Airport in Yunnan.
People screaming…
Sometimes Twitter is like a bad movie. twitter.com/Pontifex/statu…
RT @petergyang:
Google insiders explain why Google launches many products and then abandons them.
Hint: It has to do with chasing promotio…
It’s not the government’s job to create jobs. Nor is it ever the government who does that — employers/entrepreneurs do.
RT @LisaDaftari:
2 very important realizations from the current #IranProtests:
- The world sees the hypocritical regime in #Iran for who…
RT @MarkHiggie1:
One of the great questions of our time in the @Telegraph pic.twitter.com/UB4mIU5JFm
[…] i.e. saying that there are preference sets that allow this.
Unclear what “this” refers to. A ‘will of the people’?
It’s usually difficult enough to find agreement with oneself. Finding agreement within large groups, even if it were mathematically possible without violating some of Arrow’s criteria, would be intractably difficult, and the attempt reeks of intellectual megalomania.
- I’m positing that everyone agrees, […]
Sounds like Arrow’s unanimity criterion. If you’re simply saying ‘if everyone wants to eat liver, they should all eat liver’, then I agree, but that isn’t controversial because it disregards the other criteria.
- I said no system which guarantees these properties regardless of preferences.
By “properties”, do you mean the five criteria? (The Wikipedia article first lists three, then five.)
Andeutung: ‚Und deshalb muss der Staat sich einmischen.‘ ekelhaft
No, that’s exactly what it doesn’t say.
Then you can’t say “no such system exists” – either way you seem to be contradicting yourself.
Re ice cream/liver: Deutsch gives the same example using hamburgers and pizza. Are you taking into account the five axioms? Do you know them?
Yes, no such system exists
So it’s not true that “Arrow’s theorem says that [a group’s] preferences aren’t necessarily consistent”. It says that they’re necessarily inconsistent.
Is Deutsch’s account of Arrow’s theorem wrong?
Deutsch concludes further down yet:
So there is no such thing as ‘the will of the people’. There is no way to regard ‘society’ as a decision-maker with self-consistent preferences.
A few lines further down:
[A]ll five of these axioms are intuitively not just desirable to make a system fair, but essential for it to be rational. Yet they are inconsistent.
From David Deutsch’s book The Beginning of Infnity:
Arrow proved that the [five] axioms […] are, despite their reasonable appearance, logically inconsistent with each other. No way [emphasis added] of conceiving of ‘the will of the people’ can satisfy all five of them.
Let me rephrase: I believe it says there can be no consistent ‘will of the people’. As I recall, he laid out five reasonable conditions that anything resembling a consistent ‘will’ should meet, and then proved there was no way to meet all five.
Wie erzieht man ein Kind zum Glauben an die Freiheit? blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/wie-erzi…
@derSoziologeNRW @henning_soel
Das kann unmöglich stimmen: blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/school-c…
Klärung der Frage, was ich mit ›Zwang‹ meine: blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/klarung-…
I agree that we are still far away, but we are closer than 500 years ago (thanks to Popper), and we are closer than 50 years ago (thanks to @DavidDeutschOxf).
@derSoziologeNRW @henning_soel
Abgesehen davon, dass Kinder den Erwachsenen keine funktionerende Gesellschaft schulden, wird die Gesellschaft also nicht zusammenbrechen, wenn Menschen ihren Interessen frei nachgehen – im Gegenteil.